Clinical Effect of Moisturized Skin Care on Radiation Dermatitis of Head and Neck Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer may cause severe radiation dermatitis (RD) resulting in RT interruption and affecting disease control. A few studies address skin moisture changes during RT for head and neck cancer. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of moisturized skin care (MSC) on severity of RD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study includes newly diagnosed head and neck cancer patients undergoing RT. Participants were divided into MSC group and routine skin care (RSC) group based on patient's preferred decision. Skin moisture in the four quadrants of the neck was measured weekly before and after RT. RD was assessed with the Radiation Induced Skin Reaction Assessment Scale (RISRAS) and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) acute skin toxicity grading criteria. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients were enrolled, of which 49 patients were suitable for the statistical analysis. There was a statistically significant difference in the RISRAS total score since the 5th week after RT between the groups. The severity of RD was less (B=0.814, p=0.021) and the onset was later (B=-0.384, p=0.006) in the MSC group when compared to the RSC group. Skin moisture decreased with cumulative radiation dose. In the upper neck, the MSC group had a slower rate of skin moisture decrease compared to the RSC group (right upper neck: B=0.935, p=0.007; left upper neck: B=0.93, p=0.018). CONCLUSION: MSC can effectively reduce the severity and delay the onset of RD, while slows down skin moisture decrease during RT.

Homologous platelet gel on radiation-induced dermatitis in a patient receiving head and neck radiotherapy plus cetuximab: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Acute radiodermatitis is a significant complication of cancer radiotherapy, and platelet-based therapies are emerging as potential new treatments. MAIN SYMPTOMS AND IMPORTANT CLINICAL FINDINGS: In this report, we present the case of a patient with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy combined with the monoclonal antibody cetuximab. After 4 weeks of this treatment, the patient developed cutaneous radiation dermatitis. Despite receiving standard treatment with corticosteroids and emollient cream, the lesion did not improve. MAIN DIAGNOSIS: cutaneous radiation dermatitis on head and neck cancer patient. THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS: Topical application of platelet gel was initiated on the wound. From the second week of radiotherapy to the 4th week, homologous platelet-rich plasma was applied on the dermatitis using a bandage, 4 times a day. OUTCOMES: The topical treatment with homologous platelet gel resulted in complete healing of the radiodermatitis, including restoration of the epidermis, reepithelialization, and reduction in associated pain. CONCLUSION: homologous platelet gel might be an alternative to standard treatment of radiation dermatitis.

Acute radiation dermatitis among patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with proton beam therapy: Prognostic factors and treatment outcomes.

A high incidence of severe acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) has been reported for cancer patients treated by proton beam therapy (PBT). This observational study investigated the prognostic factors and treatment outcomes of ARD among patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with PBT. Fifty-seven patients with newly diagnosed NPC and treated with PBT were enrolled. ARD was recorded weekly based on the criteria of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 at treatment visits (1st to 7th weeks) and 1 week (8th week) and 1 month (11th week) after the completion of PBT. The maximum ARD grade was 1, 2, and 3 in 26 (45.6%), 24 (42.1%), and 7 (12.3%) of the patients, respectively. The peak incidence of grade 2 and 3 ARD was observed during the period of the 6th to 8th weeks. Treatment of ARD included topical corticosteroid alone in 24 (42.1%) patients, topical corticosteroid plus silver sulfadiazine in 33 (57.9%) patients, and non-adhering silicone dressing to cover severe skin wound area in 25 (43.8%) patients. In the 11th week, most grade 2 and 3 ARD had disappeared and 93.0% of the patients had ARD of grade 1 or lower. In the binary logistic regression model, we identified habitual smoking (odds ratio [OR]: 5.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-18.8, P = .012) and N2 to N3 nodal status (OR: 4.9, 95% CI: 1.6-15.4, P = .006) as independent predictors of grade 2 and 3 ARD. The results show ARD is a major concern for patients with NPC treated with PBT, especially those with habitual smoking or advanced nodal status. Topical corticosteroid, silver sulfadiazine, and non-adhering silicone dressing are effective for treating ARD induced by PBT.

Accelerated Healing from Severe Radiation Dermatitis Using Noncontact, Low-frequency Ultrasound-assisted Saline Wash Therapy.

ABSTRACT: Radiotherapy (RT) is a modality for cancer management that frequently causes critical injury to tissues adjacent to the targeted cancer site. Acute radiation dermatitis (RD) is one of the most common adverse effects of RT and may lead to secondary infection, disfigurement, and discontinuation of therapy. The authors report the efficacy of a multidisciplinary collaboration between radiation oncology, dermatology, and wound care teams in the management of severe, acute RD. This case report describes the use of noncontact, low-frequency ultrasound (NCLFU)-assisted saline wash therapy leading to accelerated healing of severe RD in an older man treated with RT for scalp squamous cell carcinoma. Although NCLFU-assisted saline wash therapy provides gentle debridement of wound surfaces and has demonstrated efficacy in the management of chronic wounds, the potential role for NCLFU therapy in RD management has not yet been explored.

Transplantation of the Stromal Vascular Fraction (SVF) Mitigates Severe Radiation-Induced Skin Injury.

Severe radiation-induced skin injury is a complication of tumor radiotherapy and nuclear accidents. Cell therapy is a potential treatment for radiation-induced skin injury. The stromal vascular fraction (SVF) is a newer material in stem cell therapy that is made up of stem cells harvested from adipose tissue, which has been shown to promote the healing of refractory wounds of different causes. In this study, SVF was isolated from patients with radiation-induced skin injury. Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) accounted for approximately 10% of the SVF by flow cytometry. Compared with the control group of rats, administration with SVF attenuated the skin injury induced by electron beam radiation. The effect of SVF on the human skin fibroblast microenvironment was determined by proteomic profiling of secreted proteins in SVF-co-cultured human skin fibroblast WS1 cells. Results revealed 293 upregulated and 1,481 downregulated proteins in the supernatant of SVF-co-cultured WS1 cells. WS1 co-culture with SVF induced secretion of multiple proteins including collagen and MMP-1. In the clinic, five patients with radiation-induced skin injury were recruited to receive SVF transfer-based therapy, either alone or combined with flap transplantation. Autogenous SVF was isolated and introduced into a multi-needle precision electronic injection device, which automatically and aseptically distributed the SVF to the exact layer of the wound in an accurate amount. After SVF transfer, wound healing clearly improved and pain was significantly relieved. The patients' skin showed satisfactory texture and shape with no further wound recurrence. Our findings suggest that transplantation of SVF could be an effective countermeasure against severe radiation-induced skin injury.

Efficacy of topical Calendula officinalis on prevalence of radiation-induced dermatitis: A randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: A randomised controlled trial was undertaken to compare the efficacy of topical Calendula officinalis (Calendula) versus standard of care (Sorbolene: 10% glycerine in cetomacragol cream) in reducing the prevalence of radiation-induced dermatitis in women undergoing breast cancer radiotherapy. METHODS: A total of 271 women were screened and 82 were randomised. The primary outcome was prevalence of acute radiation-induced dermatitis (RTOG grade 2+) assessed at multiple skin sites. A chi-squared test was conducted for the primary outcome with a worst-case scenario imputation. RESULTS: The recruitment target (n = 178) was not achieved. A total of n = 81 participants were analysed (n = 40 Calendula; n = 41 Sorbolene). There was no detectable difference in prevalence of radiation-induced dermatitis grade 2+ between the Calendula (53%) and Sorbolene (62%) groups (primary analysis OR = 0.87, 95% CI: [0.36, 2.09], P = 0.92; covariate adjusted complete case analysis OR 0.40, 95% CI: [0.13, 1.20], P = 0.10). CONCLUSION: This randomised controlled trial showed no difference between Calendula and standard of care (Sorbolene) for the prevention of radiation-induced dermatitis. However, the study was underpowered (limited recruitment) for the primary comparison.

Uso e efetividade de terapias tópicas no tratamento de radiodermatites: revisão integrativa / Use and affectiveness of topical therapies in radiodermatitis treatment: integrative review / Uso y efectividad de terapias tópicas en el tratamiento de radiodermatitis: revisión integrativa

Objetivo: descrever, a luz da pesquisa bibliográfica, o uso das terapias tópicas no tratamento de radiodermatites. Método: revisão integrativa de ensaios clínicos randomizados nas bases de dados: MEDLINE, LILACS, biblioteca COCHRANE, CINAHL e EMBASE. Após observância dos critérios de inclusão, encontrou-se 1.289 estudos, dos quais, após etapas de exclusão resultaram em 10 estudos. Resultados: foram expostos em categorias num quadro síntese incluindo: dados do estudo, participantes da pesquisa, tipo de terapia tópica utilizada; indicações, contraindicações e resultados. Conclusão: encontraram-se lacunas nos estudos e estas necessitam de investigação. Sugerem-se novos ensaios experimentais a fim de trazer respostas quanto aos tipos de terapias tópicas mais efetivas em radiodermatites, o que trará melhores condições de tratamento e assegurará ao enfermeiro uma assistência de qualidade e ao cliente oncológico uma melhor qualidade de vida

Objective: to describe, in the light of bibliographic research, the use of topical therapies in the treatment of radiodermatitis. Method: integrative review of randomized clinical trials in the databases: MEDLINE, LILACS, COCHRANE, CINAHL and EMBASE. After observing the inclusion criteria, there were 1,289 studies, of which, following exclusion stages, resulted in 10 studies. Results: they were presented in categories in a summary table including: study data, research participants, type of topical therapy used; indications, contraindications and results. Conclusion: gaps have been found in the studies and these need investigation. New experimental trials are suggested in order to provide answers regarding the types of topical therapies more effective in radiodermatites, which will bring better treatment conditions and will ensure the quality of care and the oncological client a better quality of life

Objetivo: describir, a la luz de la investigación bibliográfica, el uso de las terapias tópicas en el tratamiento de radiodermatitis. Método: revisión integrativa de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados en las bases de datos: MEDLINE, LILACS, biblioteca COCHRANE, CINAHL y EMBASE. Después de la observancia de los criterios de inclusión, se encontraron 1.289 estudios, de los cuales, después de etapas de exclusión resultaron en 10 estudios. Resultados: fueron expuestos en categorías en un cuadro síntesis incluyendo: datos del estudio, participantes de la investigación, tipo de terapia tópica utilizada; indicaciones, contraindicaciones y resultados. Conclusión: se ha encontrado lagunas en los estudios y éstas necesitan investigación. Se sugieren nuevos ensayos experimentales a fin de traer respuestas en cuanto a los tipos de terapias tópicas más efectivas en radiodermatitis, lo que traerá mejores condiciones de tratamiento y asegurará al enfermero una asistencia de calidad y al cliente oncológico una mejor calidad de vida

Topical use of Jiawei Simiao Yongan Gao to prevent radiodermatitis in patients with head and neck cancer: A retrospective cohort study.

Radiodermatitis is a common side effect of radiotherapy, but currently there is no standard treatment for its prevention. This study aimed to observe the effect of topical application of a paste based on traditional Chinese medicine, Jiawei Simiao Yongan Gao, on radiodermatitis caused by radiotherapy for patients with head and neck cancer.This was a retrospective cohort study of 40 patients with head and neck cancer evaluated during their radiotherapy. Of these, 20 patients were treated with Jiawei Simiao Yongan Gao on the irradiated skin from the beginning of radiotherapy (JSY group). The other 20 patients were given standard nursing (standard group). Acute skin reactions were classified according to the radiation-induced skin reaction assessment scale (RISRAS) and American radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) acute toxicity grading criteria every 2 weeks, and adverse effects were recorded until the end of the radiotherapy.The two groups showed differences in severity of radiodermatitis. At 0 to 30 Gy, the skin reactions were similar in the two groups, while above 40 Gy the skin reactions were significantly lower grade in the JSY group (P < .05). At 0 to 20 Gy, there was no statistical significance (P > .05); but above 30 Gy they were lower in the JSY group (P < .05).Jiawei Simiao Yongan Gao effectively alleviated acute radiodermatitis caused by radiotherapy of head and neck cancer patients compared with standard nursing.

Instruments to Evaluate Self-Management of Radiation Dermatitis in Patients With Breast Cancer.

PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION: Radiation dermatitis (RD) is an expected side effect of radiation to the breast and chest wall. Healthcare providers routinely grade the severity of RD without assessing its impact on quality of life for patients with breast cancer. Instruments are needed to identify a patient's ability and confidence to self-manage RD. LITERATURE SEARCH: A search was conducted of published literature from 2001 to 2018 that included patients who had received radiation therapy for breast cancer. A validated instrument was used to assess RD. DATA EVALUATION: Eleven instruments were identified and evaluated for assessing self-management. SYNTHESIS: One instrument was identified that measured a patient's ability to self-manage symptoms. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions-Manage Symptoms should be considered for clinical integration. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Using a validated instrument to assess patients' needs and ability to self-manage RD will promote personalized care plans tailored to each patient. Findings can be used to implement a patient-reported outcome measure into clinical practice, develop educational programs for RD management, and create personalized care plans.

Referral practices to dermatologists for the treatment of radiation dermatitis in the USA: a call for a multidisciplinary approach.

PURPOSE: Acute radiation dermatitis (RD) is a disfiguring and painful rash that occurs in up to 95% of patients receiving radiation therapy (RT) for cancer. Treatment for RD varies among practitioners with no evidence-based gold standard for management. While a multi-disciplinary approach has been utilized to manage other cancer-related toxicities, RD is most often managed by the treating radiation oncologist. METHODS: This study evaluated the referral practices of radiation oncologists to dermatologists for management of RD utilizing a survey of radiation oncologists across the USA. The goal was to identify the referral practices of radiation oncologists for RD and any barriers to a multidisciplinary approach. RESULTS: Of the 705 respondents, 15% reported ever referring patients to dermatology. Private practitioners referred significantly less than providers in academic or oncology centers (p < 0.01). Practitioners in urban settings were more likely to refer (p < 0.01), and radiation oncologists in the Southeastern USA were less likely to refer (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Lack of timely access to dermatologists in various geographic areas in addition to radiation oncologists' preference to treat RD are barriers to multidisciplinary management of RD. Inclusion of dermatologists and wound care specialists in cancer treatment teams could improve patient care and stimulate needed research into strategies for treatment and prevention of RD.

Radiation-Induced Skin Fibrosis: Pathogenesis, Current Treatment Options, and Emerging Therapeutics.

Radiotherapy (RT) has become an indispensable part of oncologic treatment protocols for a range of malignancies. However, a serious adverse effect of RT is radiodermatitis; almost 95% of patients develop moderate to severe skin reactions following radiation treatment. In the acute setting, these can be erythema, desquamation, ulceration, and pain. Chronically, soft tissue atrophy, alopecia, and stiffness can be noted. Radiodermatitis can delay oncologic treatment protocols and significantly impair quality of life. There is currently a paucity of effective treatment options and prevention strategies for radiodermatitis. Importantly, recent preclinical and clinical studies have suggested that fat grafting may be of therapeutic benefit, reversing detrimental changes to soft tissue following RT. This review outlines the damaging effects of RT on the skin and soft tissue as well as discusses available treatment options for radiodermatitis. Emerging strategies to mitigate detrimental, chronic radiation-induced changes are also presented.

Recognition and management of dermatologic complications from interventional radiology procedures.

A variety of dermatologic complications can occur after interventional radiology procedures, including fluoroscopy-induced radiation dermatitis, thermal skin injury from tumor ablation, non-target embolization to the skin, allergic reactions related to interventional radiology procedures, and dermatitis and infections at catheter sites. Yet, interventional radiologists typically lack training in dermatology. This review focuses on recognition of dermatologic complications and introduces basic principles for management of these complications. By taking a more active role in the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of dermatologic complications, interventional radiologists can improve the care for patients suffering iatrogenic skin inury.

Cutaneous radiation damage: updating a clinically challenging concern.

Cutaneous radiation damage, commonly referred to as radiation dermatitis, is a finding of considerable concern. The exposure is often from radiation therapy, a double-edged sword, removing malignant cancer cells and improving the lives of countless patients, yet being locally destructive and potentially premalignant. Among its negative consequences and complications, radiation dermatitis, a potentially severe skin reaction that occurs after the receipt of radiation therapy, presents a clinical challenge today. There are two types of cutaneous radiation dermatitis: acute and chronic. Acute radiation dermatitis manifests within 90 days after the induction of radiation therapy while chronic radiation dermatitis develops beyond 90 days of radiation. There are many risk factors associated with radiation dermatitis which can be characterized as intrinsic, extrinsic, or both. Intrinsic risk factors include concurrent chemotherapy and targeted therapy, connective tissue and skin disorders, genetic and personal factors such as age, sex, smoking habits, and nutritional status. Extrinsic factors are mainly related to the type and dose of the radiation received. Treatment options have been enhanced in the last decade, providing patients with better outcomes and improved quality of life. Such treatments include topical ointments and therapies, oral enzymes, wound dressings and surgical treatments. This article aims to review the current medical understanding of radiation dermatitis, its risk factors, pathophysiology, and treatment options.

Bone Marrow Stem Cell and Decellularized Human Amniotic Membrane for the Treatment of Nonhealing Wound After Radiation Therapy.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, our aim was to create a bioactive wound dressing that combined decellularized and lyophilized human amniotic membrane and freeze-dried rat bone marrow stem cells for the treatment of nonhealing wounds. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For the decellularized human amniotic membrane, sodium dodecyl sulfate and 1% Triton X-100 were used. The mononuclear fraction of bone marrow stem cells was isolated by density gradient centrifugation using Ficoll Paque Plus (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Investigations were conducted on Lewis inbred rats with the radiation wound model (dose of 60 Gy). On day 20 after application of radiation, the skin was excised around the radiation burn. The wound was treated with decellularized human amniotic membrane seeded with and without freeze-dried bone marrow stem cells. RESULTS: The use of a decellularized amniotic membrane for closing the burn wound increased the rate of healing by 2.5 times; the use of a decellularized amniotic membrane seeded with bone marrow stem cells or freeze-dried bone marrow stem cells increased the rate of wound healing by approximately 4 times. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of freeze-dried bone marrow stem cell may represent a novel therapeutic approach in the treatment of nonhealing wounds and other conditions. We observed no evidence of local or systemic complications related to the procedure. However, further efforts with better protocol design for future studies are needed.

Management of severe bio-radiation dermatitis induced by radiotherapy and cetuximab in patients with head and neck cancer: emphasizing the role of calcium alginate dressings.

PURPOSE: Severe bio-radiation dermatitis may develop in patients treated with concurrent radiotherapy and cetuximab for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The aim of our work was to report on the impact of a grade-specific management approach on treatment tolerability. METHODS: Concomitant radiotherapy and cetuximab was prescribed for patients deemed ineligible for cisplatin-based chemoradiation. Since 2014, an advanced wound care nursing team was established in our clinic to implement a standardized policy for skin toxicity. A central role of calcium alginate dressings was defined in our management algorithm. The correlation between patient, disease, and treatment features with severe bio-radiation dermatitis and treatment tolerability was evaluated. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2018, 51 patients were treated at our center with radiotherapy and cetuximab. The incidence of G3/G4 bio-radiation dermatitis was 43.1%. Comparing two consecutive cohorts of 26 and 25 patients treated before and after January 2014, respectively, the adoption of a grade-specific dermatitis management allowed to improve treatment tolerability. A mean radiation treatment interruption of 8.42 days (SD, 6.73; 95% CI 5.7-11.1) was reduced to 0.86 days (SD, 2.66; 95% CI - 0.28-2.02) in the more recent group (p < 0.0001). Mean relative dose intensity of cetuximab was also significantly higher (86.3% vs 74.5%, p = 0.0226). CONCLUSIONS: Routine involvement of an advanced wound care management team and early consideration for calcium alginate dressings in case of moist desquamation should be warranted to ensure high compliance to radiotherapy and cetuximab in patients with head and neck cancer.

Application of red light phototherapy in the treatment of radioactive dermatitis in patients with head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: To observe the effect of red light phototherapy (RLPT) on radioactive dermatitis (RD) caused by radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). METHODS: Sixty patients with HNC admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, 30 patients in each group. The control group received routine daily care during radiotherapy treatment. In the experimental group, in addition to routine daily care during radiotherapy treatment, photon therapy apparatus RLPT was added, 10 min/time, 2 times/day, and lasted until the end of radiotherapy. The pain and conditions of the patients' skin were assessed daily, and the skin pain and dermatitis grades of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: In terms of the reaction degree of RD, experimental group was mainly grade 0-2, and control group was mainly grade 2-3, with a significant difference (P < 0.05). In terms of skin pain, according to the pain records at week 2, 3, and 4, the pain degree increased with time. However, the score of wound pain in experimental group was significantly lower than that in control group, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The application of RLPT in the treatment of RD can help accelerate wound healing and significantly shorten healing time. It can not only reduce wounds pain of patients, promote inflammation and ulcer healing, but also ensure the smooth progress of patients' radiotherapy and improve their quality of lives, which is worth popularization and application in the clinical practice.

Docetaxel-induced radiation recall dermatitis with atypical features: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Radiation recall dermatitis (RRD) associated with actinomycin D was first described by in 1959, followed by the reporting of several RRD-inducing drugs. In 1994, a study demonstrated docetaxel-induced RRD for the first time; however, despite some case studies reporting RRD, a little has been reported on it since then. Here we present a rare case of atypical docetaxel-induced RRD. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient in his 60s was administered radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer. He continued receiving hormonal therapy for 2 years because of being in a high-risk group and became nadir. Six months since the completion of hormonal therapy, his prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level increased again. Based on the radiological examination, he was diagnosed with multiple lung, bone, and lymph node metastases. Accordingly, we started docetaxel (75 mg/m) every 5 weeks in consideration of myelosuppression for hormone-resistant multiple metastases. Although lung metastasis shrunk by one cycle docetaxel, radiotherapy for the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae was performed for back pain and lumbago. On day 21, at the end of radiotherapy, the same dose of docetaxel was administrated for the third time. On day 7, after third docetaxel administration, erythema appeared in a irradiated field of the thoracic and lumbar vertebra. Erythema primarily appeared on the anterior side of the body, and no skin reaction was noted on the posterior part of the thoracic irradiated area. Notably, no skin reaction was observed in the previously irradiated field for prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: This case report draws attention to the development of atypical RRD after administration of docetaxel and advises careful follow-up even if RRD does not appear after the first docetaxel administration.

Lesión cutánea por radiación en angioplastía coronaria compleja / Cutaneous radiation injury after failed percutaneous coronary angioplasty

Resumen: Las lesiones cutáneas por radiación (LCR) son una complicación infrecuente, con un estimado de 3.600 casos de lesiones mayores reportados en la actualidad. Presentamos un caso de lesión eritematosa mayor por radiación posterior a angioplastía coronaria fallida y en segundo tiempo angioplastía coronaria con rotablación.

Abstract: Cutaneous radiation injuries are an infrequent complication, with an estimated 3.600 cases of major injuries reported up to now. We present a case of a major erythematous lesion induced by radiation after failed coronary angioplasty and consecutive coronary rotablation.